Wednesday, May 26, 2010

SaaS & Cloud Computing and the Channel

One of our core business strategies at Intacct is to work closely with the channel to deliver our applications. Our partners- Value Added Resellers, CPA firms and Systems Integrators bring tremendous experience and talent to the Intacct family – which is very important to CFOs that are looking to implement new financial systems.

As I have written here before, amongst the cloud computing intelligentsia, there is a widespread preconceived notion that SaaS and the channel don’t mix.

I understand why this is – most of the large cloud computing and SaaS companies started out before the channel was ready for SaaS – and as such they focused exclusively on direct sales. Because the early firms grew up without channels, the natural conclusion is that SaaS and channels are not compatible.

But I think this is much more due to timing than some fundamental characteristic of SaaS and the channel. My experience is that channels fulfill demand, they don't create it. In the early days of SaaS and cloud computing, the vendors had to directly sell to clients - customers were not clamoring for cloud computing-based solutions. But in 2010, clients are clearly asking for SaaS and cloud applications - and the channel is responding to this demand.

Early SaaS and cloud companies grew without reselling channels by developing a direct sales culture, and several of these firms hired their sales executives from Oracle, which also has a direct sales culture. Once you’ve got a large direct sales organization and an entrenched direct sales culture it’s very difficult to become channel friendly – there is simply too much channel conflict to manage between a large direct sales team and the indirect channel. Note that I'm talking about reselling channels here - Salesforce in particular has a large and extremely successful ecosystem of systems integrators and consultants.

In the B2C world, consumer focused software companies are actively disintermediating the retail channel by offering SaaS and cloud computing services directly on their corporate websites. While I think this will work for inexpensive consumer products that are purchased, it's clear to me that the "come buy it on our website" approach will not work for more expensive, more considered purchases in B2B world. There is a big diference in my mind between B2C products which are purchased, and B2B products which much be sold.

So all this said, It should be clear that I very much disagree with the premise that SaaS and Channels don’t mix. At Postini, now a part of Google, we had 1,800 resellers and the channel was the key to our success. At Intacct we have more than 100 channel partners and growing.

The nature of the financial applications business is that CFOs only change out their financial systems once every 7 to 10 years – having local, expert partners that make this transition all the time is enormously important – and the VARs, CPA firms and integrators are all great at assisting CFOs in doing this. The channel reduces the cost and risk for the CFO and helps deploy best practices, which increase ROI.

The convergence of SaaS and channels is a win win win – for Intacct, for our channel partners and for our clients. We gain broad, cost-effective distribution, our channel partners gain significant new revenue streams and our customers gain from successful, high value and low risk implementations.

So that’s the perspective from the cloud computing and SaaS industry side – in my next post I’ll look at what I’m hearing about SaaS and cloud computing from the army of existing mid-market ERP channel partners.

4 comments:

Roel Gydé said...

Hi Daniel,

I really appreciate your vision on channels and SaaS. But what will the impact be of SaaS and Cloud Computing on the full channel. The full channel does not only include resellers, ISVs, SIs but also independent consultants, value added distributors, ...

On your point that channels only fulfill demand, I disagree. When looking at our channel partners we clearly see that those that focus on specific solutions are really 'developing business'. When looking at channel partners that lack that focus, we experience that these perform less.

On the aspect of SaaS and channel, I do clearly see one big action point ... education, education and education. This education is necessary to introduce the new technologies to pre-SaaS channel partners but also on a technological level.

Who will take care that onpremise applications will integrate with SaaS applications?

Cheers,
Roel

Cesar A. Alfaro A. said...

Saludos Daniel
he trabajado ya bastante tiempo sobre aplicaciones financieras bancarias e industriales... de todo tipo, agregando nuevas funcionalidades, desde software desarrollado en cobol, java , .net , developer... pero no termino de entender la convergencia de todas estas tecnologias... de alguna manera las empresas evolucionan en sus plataformas a lo largo de de expansion y crecimiento y llevan de la mano adquisicion de soluciones tecnologicas de todo tipo .... yo me pregunto no sera todo esto de cloud computing una moda a la que nos esta empujando las compañias como google o amazon y al final como desarrollador te quedas con las manos vacias porque te subes en una tecnologia que no te retribuye es decir soluciona problemas del momento y eso al final queda como sistemas legadas... no sera? que la evolucion de las tecnologias desechan mucho de lo bueno ..... por eje. lo de los maimframes... bueno un comentario nada mas... por otro lado como desarrollador de infraestructuras tradicionales me gustaria consultarte por donde comienzo con todo esto del Cloud Computing, pues a nivel de soluciones de desarrollo tengo un sinfin de ideas y experiencias pero como puedo ganar en este nuevo campo que se abre... ej. hace un par de años cuando el BI estaba emergiendo desarrolle bajo BRIO Y LUEGO SE migro a Hyperion 8.3 toda una solucion para una empresa de energia ... que paso la solucion funcionaba pero con todo esto de la absorcion de oracle... uno se queda como mencione con las manos vacias esa solucion fue para una empresa ... si teniendo la idea y el comcepto bien elaborado .... como lo desarrollo en esta nueva OLA.... Por donde empiezo, conceptualmente al menos se puede reutilizar.. pero a estas alturas esta tecnologia queda como desecho....

gracias por tus respuestas CALFARO3A@GMAIL.COM

Richard Leavitt said...

Hello Daniel

I am interested in the partner economics of re-selling subscription SaaS software. Our experience has been that software commissions of 15 - 40 points of initial sale was interesting back in the day of all up-front payments. But now is not compelling.

Yes, an ISV can highlight the partner revenues from integration, customization and training work the customer will pay. And if the partner is fulfilling demand (generated by the vendor?), then they might have few options but to sell what the customer wants.

So my question is, what's changed in how your partners calculate their economic win from pre-SaaS days. Nothing? Everything? Plus, how would you structure partner commissions for a subscription service, one time payment, time limit on commissions, commissions for life, etc?

Thanks for your thoughts here
Richard Leavitt

EJ said...

I agree that cloud computing offers a different set of opportunities for channels especially especially VARs. Cloud vendors need help in channel management services to streamline such transition.

Post a Comment